One Stop Smash Repairs Pty Ltd v Alvarez Holdings Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 444

One Stop Smash Repairs Pty Ltd v Alvarez Holdings Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 444

The email response from the plaintiff proposing payment of the security deposit by 12 monthly instalments was not an acceptance of the defendant's terms but constituted a counter-offer, and there was no acceptance of that counter-offer. Accordingly, viewed objectively, there was no concluded agreement by which the parties intended to be bound for a new lease as of 12 May 2022 or any other date.

Parties
Plaintiff: One Stop Smash Repairs Pty Ltd; Defendant: Alvarez Holdings Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 April 2023
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Decision on Plaintiff's Claim for Declaration and Specific Performance
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Formation of Contracts, Intention to Be Bound, Leases
Equity Contract Law Formation of Contracts Intention to Be Bound Leases

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

One Stop Smash Repairs Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Alvarez Holdings Pty Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Principal Judgment / Final Decision on Plaintiff's Claim for Declaration and Specific Performance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the parties entered into a binding agreement for a new lease on about 12 May 2022.
  2. 2 Whether the conduct and communications between the parties evidenced an intention to be immediately bound by a new lease agreement.

Ratio Decidendi

The email response from the plaintiff proposing payment of the security deposit by 12 monthly instalments was not an acceptance of the defendant's terms but constituted a counter-offer, and there was no acceptance of that counter-offer. Accordingly, viewed objectively, there was no concluded agreement by which the parties intended to be bound for a new lease as of 12 May 2022 or any other date.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim dismissed.

Orders

  • The Summons is dismissed.
  • The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings.