One Three Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2012] NSWLEC 1191
The proposed development fails to achieve the Townscape objectives sought by the BDCP, particularly regarding building wall height, floor space ratio, and setbacks of Building B, with unacceptable privacy impacts resulting from the inadequate setbacks; accordingly, the application must fail.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under S97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'heritage Conservation Area' 'building Height' 'setback' 'floor Space Ratio' 'privacy Impacts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposal adversely impacts on the heritage conservation area through the demolition of a contributory building and the design of the new building' 'Whether the height, setbacks, and floor space ratio of the proposal are acceptable']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed development fails to achieve the Townscape objectives sought by the BDCP, particularly regarding building wall height, floor space ratio, and setbacks of Building B, with unacceptable privacy impacts resulting from the inadequate setbacks; accordingly, the application must fail.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The development application for a mixed residential commercial development at 69 Pittwater Road, Manly, is refused.' 'The exhibits, except Exhibit 2, may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment