Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd [2007] NSWSC 301
The period of inquiry for the special purpose liquidator’s examination should not be arbitrarily limited to the dates advanced by certain examinees; a broader inquiry is warranted to properly understand the circumstances surrounding the cancellation of the rights issue.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Onefone Australia Pty Ltd; Plaintiff: DCA Resources Australia Pty Limited; Plaintiff: Pacific Finance Group Pty Limited; Plaintiff: Talent2 Works Pty Ltd; Defendant: One.Tel Limited; Defendant: Steven Sherman; Defendant: Peter Walker; Special Purpose Liquidator: Paul Gerard Weston; PBL Examinee: Martin Green; PBL Examinee: Darren Miller
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations – Directions in Winding Up / Application for Directions Under S.596 F(1)(a) of the Corporations Act During Examination
- Outcome
- Directions granted under s.596F(1)(a) of the Corporations Act generally in accordance with special purpose liquidator's request, with specified modifications; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Examination of Officers, Scope of Liquidators' Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Onefone Australia Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
DCA Resources Australia Pty Limited
Plaintiff
Pacific Finance Group Pty Limited
Plaintiff
Talent2 Works Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
One.Tel Limited
Defendant
Steven Sherman
Defendant
Peter Walker
Defendant
Paul Gerard Weston
Special Purpose Liquidator
Martin Green
PBL Examinee
Darren Miller
PBL Examinee
Procedural Posture
Corporations – Directions in Winding Up / Application for Directions Under S.596 F(1)(a) of the Corporations Act During Examination
Legal Issues
- 1 Scope of matters that may be inquired into by a special purpose liquidator during an examination under Part 5.9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
The period of inquiry for the special purpose liquidator’s examination should not be arbitrarily limited to the dates advanced by certain examinees; a broader inquiry is warranted to properly understand the circumstances surrounding the cancellation of the rights issue.
Court Disposition
Directions granted under s.596F(1)(a) of the Corporations Act generally in accordance with special purpose liquidator's request, with specified modifications; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Leave granted to special purpose liquidator to file interlocutory process.
- Directions made under s.596F(1)(a) Corporations Act with specified modifications to paragraph 1(b) regarding bridge loan, underwriting agreement, and agreement to subscribe for shares under the RRI.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment