OneSteel Wire Pty Ltd Ropes Award [2005] NSWIRComm 293
The Commission is satisfied that the proposed award, having been reached through genuine negotiation and with unanimous consent of all parties and affected employees, meets all legislative and wage principles; therefore, the new award is made as applied for, rescinding and replacing the previous award.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for New Industrial Award / Decision at First Instance
- Outcome
- new award made by consent, replacing prior award
- Legal Topics
- ['award Variation' 'remuneration' 'superannuation' 'workplace Change']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for New Industrial Award / Decision at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to make a new industrial award for OneSteel Wire Pty Ltd employees at Wire Rope Works Newcastle' 'Whether the proposed award meets legislative requirements and State Wage Case principles' 'Whether the consent of the parties is genuine and adequate']
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission is satisfied that the proposed award, having been reached through genuine negotiation and with unanimous consent of all parties and affected employees, meets all legislative and wage principles; therefore, the new award is made as applied for, rescinding and replacing the previous award.
Court Disposition
new award made by consent, replacing prior award
Orders
- ['OneSteel Wire Pty Ltd Ropes Award is made effective from first pay period on or after 1 September 2005 and will remain in force until 31 August 2008.' 'The previous OneSteel Wire Pty Ltd Ropes Award (343 IG 529) is rescinded and replaced.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment