One. Tel (In Liq) v David Watson and Anor [2009] NSWCA 282
The deed of arrangement and the assignment of rights under the policy (upon notice) operated as an absolute assignment in law to the trustee, who thus retained standing to pursue the insurer after termination of the deed. There were no words in the deed requiring the right to enforce the claim to end with termination. The assignment did not become conditional or void; it continued for the benefit of those intended by the trust, and thus the appeal was allowed and the primary judgment set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant: One.Tel Limited (In Liquidation); First Respondent: David Watson; Second Respondent: CGU Insurance Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Decision of the Supreme Court Equity Division (mac Dougall J, 19 November 2008), NSW Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Deeds of Arrangement, Assignment of Chose in Action, Trustee Standing, Directors and Officers Insurance, Effect of Termination of Deed of Arrangement, Legal/equitable Assignment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
One.Tel Limited (In Liquidation)
Appellant
David Watson
First Respondent
CGU Insurance Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Decision of the Supreme Court Equity Division (mac Dougall J, 19 November 2008), NSW Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustee of a terminated deed of arrangement has standing to pursue proceedings as assignee of rights under a directors' liability policy
- 2 Whether assignment was 'absolute' within s 12 of Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)
- 3 Whether the deed's termination vitiated the trustee's right to continue recovery action against the insurer
Ratio Decidendi
The deed of arrangement and the assignment of rights under the policy (upon notice) operated as an absolute assignment in law to the trustee, who thus retained standing to pursue the insurer after termination of the deed. There were no words in the deed requiring the right to enforce the claim to end with termination. The assignment did not become conditional or void; it continued for the benefit of those intended by the trust, and thus the appeal was allowed and the primary judgment set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- (1) Appeal allowed.
- (2) The appellant (One.Tel) to file within 14 days short minutes of order giving effect to these reasons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment