R v Casey Cameron [2016] NSWDC 60

R v Casey Cameron [2016] NSWDC 60

The court held that no sentence other than imprisonment was appropriate, but because the offending involved very small quantities at street level, was connected to the offender's methylamphetamine addiction, attracted a 25% discount for the earliest guilty plea, and was accompanied by remorse, insight and rehabilitation prospects, a sentence of no more than 2 years was likely and the offender should be assessed for suitability for an Intensive Correction Order.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 April 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Ongoing Supply of Prohibited Drugs / Remarks on Sentence After Guilty Plea; Matter Adjourned for Intensive Correction Order Assessment and Sentencing
Outcome
The offender was referred for assessment for suitability for an Intensive Correction Order and the matter was adjourned for consideration of the assessment report and sentencing.
Legal Topics
['ongoing Supply of Prohibited Drugs' 'methylamphetamine Supply' 'intensive Correction Order' 'early Guilty Plea' 'general Deterrence' 'rehabilitation']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing' 'drug Offences'] ['ongoing Supply of Prohibited Drugs' 'methylamphetamine Supply' 'intensive Correction Order' 'early Guilty Plea' 'general Deterrence' 'rehabilitation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Ongoing Supply of Prohibited Drugs / Remarks on Sentence After Guilty Plea; Matter Adjourned for Intensive Correction Order Assessment and Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the offending for ongoing supply of prohibited drugs warranted full-time custody or another sentencing option' 'Whether the offender should be assessed for suitability for an Intensive Correction Order' "How the offender's early plea, drug addiction, remorse, prior record, rehabilitation prospects and the small quantities supplied affected sentence"]

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that no sentence other than imprisonment was appropriate, but because the offending involved very small quantities at street level, was connected to the offender's methylamphetamine addiction, attracted a 25% discount for the earliest guilty plea, and was accompanied by remorse, insight and rehabilitation prospects, a sentence of no more than 2 years was likely and the offender should be assessed for suitability for an Intensive Correction Order.

Court Disposition

The offender was referred for assessment for suitability for an Intensive Correction Order and the matter was adjourned for consideration of the assessment report and sentencing.

Orders

  • ['I am satisfied, having considered all the alternatives, that no sentence other than imprisonment is appropriate.' 'I am satisfied that the sentence is likely to be for a period of no more than 2 years.' 'The offender is referred for assessment for suitability for a Intensive Correction Order.' 'I adjourn the...