R v OPA [2004] NSWCCA 464

R v OPA [2004] NSWCCA 464

The sentencing judge erred by considering un-tendered material and setting an erroneously high starting point. Taking due account of the applicant's plea and value of assistance, and within the appropriate sentencing range for large commercial quantity supply of MDMA, the proper sentence is 5 years 8 months with a non-parole period of 4 years 3 months. Special circumstances exist based on restrictive conditions in protective custody, but do not warrant further reduction of the non-parole period below ¾ of the total term.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: OPA
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; applicant resentenced
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Drug Offences, Discount for Plea, Discount for Assistance, Special Circumstances, Non Parole Period, Statutory Maxima, Quantity of Drugs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 27 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

OPA

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred by taking into account information not properly tendered
  2. 2 Whether the discount provided for the early guilty plea was adequate
  3. 3 Whether the discount for assistance to authorities was adequate

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge erred by considering un-tendered material and setting an erroneously high starting point. Taking due account of the applicant's plea and value of assistance, and within the appropriate sentencing range for large commercial quantity supply of MDMA, the proper sentence is 5 years 8 months with a non-parole period of 4 years 3 months. Special circumstances exist based on restrictive conditions in protective custody, but do not warrant further reduction of the non-parole period below ¾ of the total term.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; applicant resentenced

Orders

  • Grant leave to appeal
  • Allow the appeal