Optima Developments Pty Limited -v- General, Manager, Wyong Shire Council [2002] NSWADT 99
The deleted identifying details in Documents 1 and 2 related to alleged breaches of the Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Enforcement Act 1995 and therefore to the enforcement of the law; disclosure would identify the informant; the circumstances supported an implied understanding that the informant's identity would remain confidential; and it was reasonably necessary for the proper administration of government not to disclose the identity, so the law enforcement exemption applied and the override discretion was not exercised.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of an Agency Decision Refusing Access to Parts of Documents Under the Freedom of Information Act 1989 / Principal Matter Decision
- Outcome
- The agency's decision to refuse access to the documents in dispute was affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['access to Documents' 'exempt Documents' 'law Enforcement and Public Safety' 'confidential Source of Information' 'restricted Documents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of an Agency Decision Refusing Access to Parts of Documents Under the Freedom of Information Act 1989 / Principal Matter Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the documents relate to the enforcement or administration of the law.' 'Whether disclosure of the deleted material could reasonably be expected to enable the existence or identity of any confidential source of information to be ascertained.' 'Whether the Tribunal should exercise its discretion to override the exemption and provide access.']
Ratio Decidendi
The deleted identifying details in Documents 1 and 2 related to alleged breaches of the Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Enforcement Act 1995 and therefore to the enforcement of the law; disclosure would identify the informant; the circumstances supported an implied understanding that the informant's identity would remain confidential; and it was reasonably necessary for the proper administration of government not to disclose the identity, so the law enforcement exemption applied and the override discretion was not exercised.
Court Disposition
The agency's decision to refuse access to the documents in dispute was affirmed.
Orders
- ["The agency's decision to refuse access to the documents in dispute is affirmed." 'All exempt material to be returned to J Battese representing the agency after twenty-eight days of the date of this decision if an appeal has not been filed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment