Media Ocean Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited (No 3) [2009] FCA 460
Given both parties had acted reasonably in compromising the security amount, it was appropriate that there be no order as to costs for the security for costs application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory / Security for Costs Application
- Outcome
- No order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory / Security for Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there should be an order for costs following compromise on security for costs']
Ratio Decidendi
Given both parties had acted reasonably in compromising the security amount, it was appropriate that there be no order as to costs for the security for costs application.
Court Disposition
No order as to costs
Orders
- ['There be no order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment