Skyrise Consultants Pty Ltd v Metroland Funds Management Ltd [2011] NSWCA 406
A prior oral agreement that contradicts a subsequent written agreement cannot vary, override, or coexist as part of the final contractual arrangement; the written contract represents the complete agreement between the parties in such circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['oral Agreement' 'variation of Written Agreement' 'parol Evidence Rule' 'partly Oral and Partly Written Contract' 'collateral Contract']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an oral agreement alleged prior to entering a written agreement could vary or contradict the written agreement' 'Whether the contract was partly oral and partly in writing']
Ratio Decidendi
A prior oral agreement that contradicts a subsequent written agreement cannot vary, override, or coexist as part of the final contractual arrangement; the written contract represents the complete agreement between the parties in such circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment