Cassaniti v Cassaniti [2008] NSWSC 258

Cassaniti v Cassaniti [2008] NSWSC 258

The plaintiff was not a person in financial need warranting the making of an order for provision under the Act, considering his assets, forthcoming inheritance, and lack of significant contribution or relationship with the deceased. The $5,000 legacy was not inadequate for proper maintenance and advancement in life.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Family provision claim dismissed. Trustees for sale of Campsie property appointed.
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'adequate Provision' 'estate Distribution' 'appointment of Trustees for Sale']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Application / Final Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether Maria Cassaniti made adequate provision for Orazio Cassaniti in her will' 'Appointment of trustees for sale of the Campsie property']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff was not a person in financial need warranting the making of an order for provision under the Act, considering his assets, forthcoming inheritance, and lack of significant contribution or relationship with the deceased. The $5,000 legacy was not inadequate for proper maintenance and advancement in life.

Court Disposition

Family provision claim dismissed. Trustees for sale of Campsie property appointed.

Orders

  • ['Claims for relief in paragraphs 1 and 1A of the further amended summons dismissed.' 'Clas Einberg and Matthew John Rowe appointed as trustees for sale of the Campsie property.' 'Property vested in trustees on statutory trust for sale under Div 6 of Pt 4 of Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW).' 'Any party may purchase the...