Pearson v Arcadia Stores Guyra Limited No 2 [1935] HCA 42
Rule 22 of sec. III of Part II of the High Court Rules covers enforcement of injunctions, such that upon due institution of an appeal, the execution—including enforcement by writ of attachment—of the judgment appealed from is stayed, absent leave of the Court.
- Parties
- Appellant: Oscar Randolph Pearson; Respondent: Arcadia Stores, Guyra, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order of the Supreme Court (Nicholas J.) discharged; motion for leave to issue a writ of attachment dismissed; costs to be taxed and set off as ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Enforcement of Injunctions, Writ of Attachment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oscar Randolph Pearson
Appellant
Arcadia Stores, Guyra, Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Rule 22 of section III, Part II of the High Court Rules precludes issuing a writ of attachment for contempt in breach of a restraining injunction when an appeal has been duly instituted.
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 22 of sec. III of Part II of the High Court Rules covers enforcement of injunctions, such that upon due institution of an appeal, the execution—including enforcement by writ of attachment—of the judgment appealed from is stayed, absent leave of the Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order of the Supreme Court (Nicholas J.) discharged; motion for leave to issue a writ of attachment dismissed; costs to be taxed and set off as ordered.
Orders
- Order of Supreme Court of New South Wales discharged.
- Motion for writ of attachment dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment