Erten v Kellogs (Australia) Pty Limited [2001] NSWCC 139

Erten v Kellogs (Australia) Pty Limited [2001] NSWCC 139

The Court accepted the applicant's evidence and the assessments of Dr Patrick, supported by Dr Mahony and by radiographic and electrophysical tests, over the respondent's medical evidence. It found that the applicant suffered work-related back injuries on 25 October 1997 and 3 January 2000, resulting in 18 per cent permanent impairment of the back and 12 per cent permanent loss of efficient use of the right leg at or above the knee, with no deductible proportion under s 68A. The applicant had been partially incapacitated since 19 September 2000, his ability to earn was less than the probable earnings by more than the maximum applicable statutory rate, and he was therefore entitled to...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 2001
Procedural Posture
Workers Compensation Claim for Weekly Payments and Lump Sums / Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Award made for the applicant for weekly payments, lump sum permanent impairment compensation, medical expenses, interest liberty, and costs.
Legal Topics
['workplace Back Injury' 'weekly Payments' 'permanent Impairment' 'lump Sum Compensation' 'earning Capacity' 'medical Expenses' 'costs']
['workers Compensation'] ['workplace Back Injury' 'weekly Payments' 'permanent Impairment' 'lump Sum Compensation' 'earning Capacity' 'medical Expenses' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Workers Compensation Claim for Weekly Payments and Lump Sums / Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant suffered injury to his back on 25 October 1997 and 3 January 2000 arising out of or in the course of his employment with the respondent.' 'Whether the applicant suffered permanent impairment of the back and permanent loss of efficient use of the right leg at or above the knee as a result of the work injuries.' 'Whether any deductible proportion should be applied under s 68A for pre-existing degenerative changes.' 'Whether the applicant was partially incapacitated for work from 19 September 2000 and entitled to weekly payments at the maximum statutory rate.' 'What lump sum amounts should be awarded under ss 66 and 67.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court accepted the applicant's evidence and the assessments of Dr Patrick, supported by Dr Mahony and by radiographic and electrophysical tests, over the respondent's medical evidence. It found that the applicant suffered work-related back injuries on 25 October 1997 and 3 January 2000, resulting in 18 per cent permanent impairment of the back and 12 per cent permanent loss of efficient use of the right leg at or above the knee, with no deductible proportion under s 68A. The applicant had been partially incapacitated since 19 September 2000, his ability to earn was less than the probable earnings by more than the maximum applicable statutory rate, and he was therefore entitled to...

Court Disposition

Award made for the applicant for weekly payments, lump sum permanent impairment compensation, medical expenses, interest liberty, and costs.

Orders

  • ['Award to the applicant under s 40 at the rate of $474.40 per week as adjusted from 19 September 2000 to date and continuing.' 'Award to the applicant under s 66 in the sum of $10,800 in respect of permanent impairment of the back.' 'Award to the applicant in the sum of $9,000 in respect of 12 per cent permanent...