Ostaford Pty Limited v Newcastle City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1198
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application No DA 2014/1093 / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'demolition of Existing Improvements' 'take Away Food Premises' 'conciliation Conference' 'section 34 Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application No DA 2014/1093 / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
Court Disposition
Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Orders
- ["Final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement were made on 18 May 2016."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment