Waterhouse v R [1911] HCA 20
A person without a certificate may have a property right in opium sufficient for it to be the subject of larceny, notwithstanding statutory prohibitions on possession.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Oswald Victor Waterhouse; Respondent: The King
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 1911
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Special Leave to Appeal / High Court Application for Special Leave From Supreme Court of New South Wales Decision
- Outcome
- special leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Larceny, Possession of Opium, Prohibited Substances
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oswald Victor Waterhouse
Applicant
The King
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Special Leave to Appeal / High Court Application for Special Leave From Supreme Court of New South Wales Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether opium, the possession of which is prohibited without a certificate, can be the subject of larceny
Ratio Decidendi
A person without a certificate may have a property right in opium sufficient for it to be the subject of larceny, notwithstanding statutory prohibitions on possession.
Court Disposition
special leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment