Ousley Pty Limited v. Warringah Shire Council [1998] NSWLEC 139
Clause 55 is concerned with the means of vehicular and pedestrian access to the site and, properly construed, refers to an aspect of the proposed development rather than a characteristic of the land. It fixes a standard requiring access not to be between the site and a main road or between the site and a public road within 90 metres of its intersection with a main road. It does not prohibit the carrying out of the proposed refreshment rooms and service station, and is a development standard amenable to variation under State Environmental Planning Policy No 1.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Consent / Determination of Preliminary Question of Law
- Outcome
- The preliminary question of law was answered No; cl 55 did not prohibit the proposed development. No order as to costs was made.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'development Standards' 'prohibited Development' 'access to Main Roads' 'state Environmental Planning Policy No 1 Variation' 'warringah Local Environmental Plan 1985 Cl 55']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Consent / Determination of Preliminary Question of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development is prohibited having regard to the provisions of Clause 55 of Warringah Local Environmental Plan 1985.' 'Whether Clause 55 is a development standard amenable to variation under State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 or operates as a prohibition on the proposed development.']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 55 is concerned with the means of vehicular and pedestrian access to the site and, properly construed, refers to an aspect of the proposed development rather than a characteristic of the land. It fixes a standard requiring access not to be between the site and a main road or between the site and a public road within 90 metres of its intersection with a main road. It does not prohibit the carrying out of the proposed refreshment rooms and service station, and is a development standard amenable to variation under State Environmental Planning Policy No 1.
Court Disposition
The preliminary question of law was answered No; cl 55 did not prohibit the proposed development. No order as to costs was made.
Orders
- ['The question whether the proposed development is prohibited having regard to the provisions of Clause 55 of Warringah Local Environmental Plan 1985 was answered: No.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment