Owen Brewster v BMW Australia Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1602
There is a discrete question of law of public importance regarding the Court's power to make a common fund order in representative proceedings, which is appropriate for separate determination and removal to the Court of Appeal for authoritative resolution.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Representative Proceedings (class Action) / Interlocutory Application for Separate Question and Removal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for separate question granted with removal to the Court of Appeal; orders made on 22 October 2018.
- Legal Topics
- ['class Actions' 'representative Proceedings' 'common Fund Orders' 'separate Questions' 'removal to Court of Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceedings (class Action) / Interlocutory Application for Separate Question and Removal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Supreme Court of NSW has power to make a common fund order in representative proceedings' 'Whether it is appropriate in the circumstances to remove the separate question to the Court of Appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
There is a discrete question of law of public importance regarding the Court's power to make a common fund order in representative proceedings, which is appropriate for separate determination and removal to the Court of Appeal for authoritative resolution.
Court Disposition
Application for separate question granted with removal to the Court of Appeal; orders made on 22 October 2018.
Orders
- ['A separate question is to be determined: whether the Supreme Court has power to make a common fund order in these representative proceedings.' 'The proceedings are to be removed to the Court of Appeal for determination of the separate question.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment