Owners Corporation Strata plan 56927 v Horner and anor [2012] NSWLEC 1146
There was insufficient evidence that the trees posed anything more than a theoretical possibility of failure. No signs of instability or imminent risk were observed, and the requirements of s 10(2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 were not satisfied. The court's jurisdiction to make intervention orders was therefore not engaged.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 / Final Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'neighbourhood Property Rights']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 2 / Final Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the trees on the respondent's property are likely to cause damage to property or injury to persons within the meaning of s 10(2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006" 'Whether orders should be made under s 9 of the Act to remove the trees']
Ratio Decidendi
There was insufficient evidence that the trees posed anything more than a theoretical possibility of failure. No signs of instability or imminent risk were observed, and the requirements of s 10(2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 were not satisfied. The court's jurisdiction to make intervention orders was therefore not engaged.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application to remove the trees is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment