Owners Corp Strata Plan v Charbel CJ Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 1286
Both defendants were using their premises as fast food outlets within the meaning of cl.19.1(a) of the Strata Management Statement. As lessees, they were bound to comply with the restriction by virtue of s.28W of the Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 (NSW) and the incorporation of the Statement into the by-laws. There was no inconsistency between the Statement and any condition of development consent. The plaintiff was entitled to injunctions restraining the conduct of fast food outlets.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings Claim for Injunction / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Injunctions to be granted restraining each defendant from conducting a fast food outlet; further orders to be made pursuant to short minutes; defendants to pay plaintiff's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['strata Management Statement' 'negative Covenant' 'construction of Covenants' 'injunctive Relief' 'user of Premises' 'construction of by Laws']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings Claim for Injunction / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether lessees of retail strata lots are bound by a restriction in a Strata Management Statement prohibiting use as a fast food outlet' "Whether the businesses operated by the defendants are 'fast food outlets' within the meaning of the Strata Management Statement" 'Whether development consent conditions override the Strata Management Statement under s 28W(5) of the Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 (NSW)' 'What relief is appropriate in the circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
Both defendants were using their premises as fast food outlets within the meaning of cl.19.1(a) of the Strata Management Statement. As lessees, they were bound to comply with the restriction by virtue of s.28W of the Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 (NSW) and the incorporation of the Statement into the by-laws. There was no inconsistency between the Statement and any condition of development consent. The plaintiff was entitled to injunctions restraining the conduct of fast food outlets.
Court Disposition
Injunctions to be granted restraining each defendant from conducting a fast food outlet; further orders to be made pursuant to short minutes; defendants to pay plaintiff's costs.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff to bring in short minutes of order reflecting the judgment for injunctions restraining use of the premises as fast food outlets.' "Defendants to pay plaintiff's costs, including any reserved costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment