Owners of Strata Plan 5082 v Yu [2015] NSWLEC 1519
On the evidence, the roots of the Eucalypt have caused damage to the applicant's sewer and are likely to continue to do so; s 10(2) of the Act is satisfied, justifying an order for removal. Insufficient evidence supports roof damage by the tree. Compensation is not ordered as agreed by the parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Tree Dispute Application / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'damage to Property' 'compensation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Tree Dispute Application / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Eucalypt tree caused damage to the sewer of applicant's property" 'Whether the tree should be ordered to be removed' 'Whether compensation should be ordered for repairs and fees']
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence, the roots of the Eucalypt have caused damage to the applicant's sewer and are likely to continue to do so; s 10(2) of the Act is satisfied, justifying an order for removal. Insufficient evidence supports roof damage by the tree. Compensation is not ordered as agreed by the parties.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- ['Respondent to engage and pay for AQF level 3 arborist with insurance to remove Eucalyptus sp. from rear of property within 90 days.' 'Tree to be cut to a height between 1.5m above ground and ground level; stump to be poisoned to prevent suckering and kill roots.' 'Work to be carried out in accordance with...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment