Owners Strata Plan 58577 v Banmor Developments Finance Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 174
A sufficient case has not been made out to justify granting leave to file an additional hydraulics expert report, as Dr Robinson's qualifications and appointment process did not exclude hydraulic expertise, and court aims to reduce, not increase, the number of expert witnesses.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceeding / Interlocutory Application for Leave to File Further Expert Report
- Outcome
- Leave to file further expert report refused
- Legal Topics
- ['court Appointed Expert' 'expert Evidence' 'leave to Adduce Additional Expert Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceeding / Interlocutory Application for Leave to File Further Expert Report
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be given to a party to file an expert report in response to the report of the court-appointed expert']
Ratio Decidendi
A sufficient case has not been made out to justify granting leave to file an additional hydraulics expert report, as Dr Robinson's qualifications and appointment process did not exclude hydraulic expertise, and court aims to reduce, not increase, the number of expert witnesses.
Court Disposition
Leave to file further expert report refused
Orders
- ['Plaintiff granted leave to file the report of Dr Ian Cordery dated 7 February 2006, notwithstanding it is out of time.' 'Defendants directed to file any non-expert evidence by Tuesday 30 May 2006.' "If Dr Robinson deems it appropriate to file a response to Dr Cordery's report, such report to be filed by Friday 12...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment