Owners Strata Plan 76767 v Waverley Council [2007] NSWLEC 144
The revised balustrading and privacy screen solution reasonably satisfied privacy concerns while mitigating structural issues with the balconies, therefore the s96 modification should be allowed and the s121ZK Order should be varied accordingly.
- Parties
- Applicant: Owners Strata Plan 76767; Respondent: Waverley Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After S34 Conference
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed in part; orders varied
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, S96 Modification, Balcony Construction, S121 ZK Order, Privacy Screens, Balustrading Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Owners Strata Plan 76767
Applicant
Waverley Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After S34 Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the s121ZK Order to comply with modified consent conditions was appropriate
- 2 Whether the s96 modifications to the balconies should be allowed
Ratio Decidendi
The revised balustrading and privacy screen solution reasonably satisfied privacy concerns while mitigating structural issues with the balconies, therefore the s96 modification should be allowed and the s121ZK Order should be varied accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed in part; orders varied
Orders
- Appeal No 10161 of 2007: The appeal is upheld; Development application No. DA-301/2003 is modified as set in annexure 'A'.
- Appeal No 10750 of 2006: The appeal pursuant to section 121ZK is upheld in part; the order issued on 31 July 2006 is varied as outlined in the judgment, including compliance with modified condition 3, varied wording, and a 90-day compliance period from 19 March 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment