Owners SP 30339 v Torada Pty Ltd & Anor [2008] NSWSC 1154
Torada owned the part of the boundary wall on its land, but committed trespass by demolishing the Plaintiff's half without consent. There was no established nuisance justifying an injunction. Damages are to be assessed based on the cost of constructing a wall on Plaintiff's side.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Owners Strata Plan No 30339; First Defendant: Torada Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Owners Strata Plan No 80811
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial, Awaiting Assessment of Damages and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Plaintiff entitled to damages for trespass, to be assessed; injunction refused.
- Legal Topics
- Trespass, Nuisance, Boundary Disputes, Dividing Fences, Injunctions, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Owners Strata Plan No 30339
Plaintiff
Torada Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Owners Strata Plan No 80811
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial, Awaiting Assessment of Damages and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Ownership of boundary wall at time of demolition
- 2 Whether demolition by Torada constituted trespass
- 3 Whether a nuisance was created by removal of wall
Ratio Decidendi
Torada owned the part of the boundary wall on its land, but committed trespass by demolishing the Plaintiff's half without consent. There was no established nuisance justifying an injunction. Damages are to be assessed based on the cost of constructing a wall on Plaintiff's side.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff entitled to damages for trespass, to be assessed; injunction refused.
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim for mandatory injunction refused.
- Interlocutory order for temporary fence dissolved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment