P v D1 & Ors [2009] NSWSC 1492
Access to court file documents will be granted to the applicants unless parties demonstrate good grounds for refusal, consistent with Practice Note SC Gen 2 and the principle of open justice.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: P; First Defendant: D1; Second Defendant: D2; Third Defendant: Commonwealth Bank of Australia; Fourth Defendant: D4; Applicant: Kate McClymont
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Access to Court File / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application adjourned for submissions; parties directed to indicate whether access to various documents is contested and on what basis.
- Legal Topics
- Access to Court Files, Media Applications, Open Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P
Plaintiff
D1
First Defendant
D2
Second Defendant
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Third Defendant
D4
Fourth Defendant
Kate McClymont
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Application for Access to Court File / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the media applicants should be granted access to the court file in accordance with Practice Note SC Gen 2
Ratio Decidendi
Access to court file documents will be granted to the applicants unless parties demonstrate good grounds for refusal, consistent with Practice Note SC Gen 2 and the principle of open justice.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned for submissions; parties directed to indicate whether access to various documents is contested and on what basis.
Orders
- Parties to indicate to the Court by 2.00pm tomorrow whether access to the orders of the Court, Summons, Amended Summons, Judgment of Palmer J, and affidavits is contested and on what basis.
- Application adjourned to 2.00pm tomorrow, Thursday 29 October 2009, subject to any submissions this afternoon.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment