PS Graham & Assoc. v Hornsby SC & Ors. [2005] NSWLEC 545

PS Graham & Assoc. v Hornsby SC & Ors. [2005] NSWLEC 545

The court found that with suitable conditions, the impacts on traffic and access would not be of sufficient significance to warrant refusal, and the proposal would not so adversely affect the heritage significance of the Wilkinson house as to preclude consent. The subdivision complies with planning controls and objectives, and the heritage impact can be managed through landscaping and house design modifications.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 October 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal upheld. Deferred commencement development consent granted subject to conditions.
Legal Topics
['development Application' 'subdivision' 'heritage Significance' 'resident Objections' 'vehicular Access' 'local Environmental Plan']
['planning and Environment' 'heritage'] ['development Application' 'subdivision' 'heritage Significance' 'resident Objections' 'vehicular Access' 'local Environmental Plan']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the impacts on neighbouring residents regarding vehicular traffic require refusal of the application' 'Whether the proposal would adversely affect the heritage significance of the Wilkinson house and its setting so as to warrant refusal']

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that with suitable conditions, the impacts on traffic and access would not be of sufficient significance to warrant refusal, and the proposal would not so adversely affect the heritage significance of the Wilkinson house as to preclude consent. The subdivision complies with planning controls and objectives, and the heritage impact can be managed through landscaping and house design modifications.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld. Deferred commencement development consent granted subject to conditions.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. 2311/03 for subdivision of Lot 105 DP 601734 into two lots is determined by granting of development consent subject to conditions.' 'Exhibits F and G are retained.']