P v The Queen [1986] FCA 145

P v The Queen [1986] FCA 145

The sentences imposed, including the cumulative sentence for gross indecency and the non-parole period of five years, were within the range established by legislation and the circumstances of the offences; they were not manifestly excessive and reflected the seriousness of the conduct involved.

Parties
Appellant: P.; Respondent: The Queen
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 April 1986
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Incest, Gross Indecency, Sentencing, Manifestly Excessive Sentence, Non Parole Period
Criminal Law Incest Gross Indecency Sentencing Manifestly Excessive Sentence Non Parole Period

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P.

Appellant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed for incest and gross indecency were manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the non-parole period was appropriate, given the seriousness of the offence

Ratio Decidendi

The sentences imposed, including the cumulative sentence for gross indecency and the non-parole period of five years, were within the range established by legislation and the circumstances of the offences; they were not manifestly excessive and reflected the seriousness of the conduct involved.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal be dismissed.