PA v R [2015] NSWCCA 18
The guilty verdict on count 4 was not inconsistent with the jury's failure to reach a verdict on count 5. There was a clear evidentiary basis to explain the difference, as the complainant made prompt complaint and corroborated the indecent act (count 4), but not the alleged sexual intercourse (count 5). The conviction was not unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence, considering the credibility of the complainant's account, corroboration through prompt complaint, and the lack of evidence and delay regarding the other counts.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Conviction Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Conviction Granted; Appeal Determined
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against conviction granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['conviction Appeal' 'inconsistent Verdicts' 'sexual Assault' 'indecent Act' 'unreasonable Verdict']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Conviction Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Conviction Granted; Appeal Determined
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether conviction on one count and jury disagreement on another constituted inconsistent verdicts' 'Whether the conviction was unreasonable and not supported by evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
The guilty verdict on count 4 was not inconsistent with the jury's failure to reach a verdict on count 5. There was a clear evidentiary basis to explain the difference, as the complainant made prompt complaint and corroborated the indecent act (count 4), but not the alleged sexual intercourse (count 5). The conviction was not unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence, considering the credibility of the complainant's account, corroboration through prompt complaint, and the lack of evidence and delay regarding the other counts.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against conviction granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against conviction is granted.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment