McC v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 25
Defence counsel expressly indicated that he did not require J or A McC to be called as witnesses and made a rational forensic choice in doing so. Accordingly, the Crown Prosecutor was not obliged to call them. No miscarriage of justice occurred and the supplementary ground of appeal fails. Leave to rely on the supplementary ground of appeal is refused, and the appeal is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Hearing of Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to rely on supplementary ground refused; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ["crown Prosecutor's Obligation to Call Witnesses" 'competence and Compellability of Child Witnesses' 'miscarriage of Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Hearing of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Crown Prosecutor was obliged to call the children J and A as witnesses' 'Whether failure to call the children resulted in a miscarriage of justice' "Competence and reliability of child witnesses with Asperger's syndrome" 'Admissibility of hearsay statements under Evidence Act s 65']
Ratio Decidendi
Defence counsel expressly indicated that he did not require J or A McC to be called as witnesses and made a rational forensic choice in doing so. Accordingly, the Crown Prosecutor was not obliged to call them. No miscarriage of justice occurred and the supplementary ground of appeal fails. Leave to rely on the supplementary ground of appeal is refused, and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to rely on supplementary ground refused; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to rely on supplementary ground of appeal refused' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment