Carreno v R [2023] NSWCCA 20
The sentencing judge correctly dealt with the applicant's youth, found no significant causal connection between immaturity and the offences, and attributed limited weight in light of the grave violent and sexual offending, planning, and subsequent criminal conduct; the aggregate sentence imposed was within the reasonable range and not manifestly excessive.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Determination of Sentence Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'manifest Excess' 'youth and Immaturity' 'causal Connection' 'sexual Assault' 'home Invasion' 'deterrence' 'rehabilitation' 'objective Seriousness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Determination of Sentence Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'whether the sentencing judge failed to take into account a causal connection between youth or immaturity and offending' 'whether the sentencing judge failed to provide sufficient reasons for finding of no causal connection between youth or immaturity and offending']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge correctly dealt with the applicant's youth, found no significant causal connection between immaturity and the offences, and attributed limited weight in light of the grave violent and sexual offending, planning, and subsequent criminal conduct; the aggregate sentence imposed was within the reasonable range and not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to file the appeal out of time granted.' 'Leave to appeal allowed.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment