Hudson Investment Group & Anor v Pacific Holdings [2006] NSWSC 873
A stay of enforcement of the judgment in NSW is granted pending the outcome of the New Zealand appeal, on the basis that Hudson Investment Group Limited proffers a written undertaking not to deal with assets outside ordinary business until final determination of the appeal. Hudson has an arguable case on appeal, the appeal will be heard shortly, and Pacific Holdings will not lose the potential fruits of its judgment if the undertaking is given.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Stay of Enforcement of Foreign Judgment / Application for Stay Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay of enforcement of registered judgment granted pending outcome of appeal, subject to undertaking; costs reserved; argument on costs stood over.
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Judgment' 'foreign Judgment Enforcement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Stay of Enforcement of Foreign Judgment / Application for Stay Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether enforcement of a registered foreign judgment should be stayed pending appeal' 'Whether Hudson has an arguable case on appeal' "Balance of convenience and protection of respondent's rights"]
Ratio Decidendi
A stay of enforcement of the judgment in NSW is granted pending the outcome of the New Zealand appeal, on the basis that Hudson Investment Group Limited proffers a written undertaking not to deal with assets outside ordinary business until final determination of the appeal. Hudson has an arguable case on appeal, the appeal will be heard shortly, and Pacific Holdings will not lose the potential fruits of its judgment if the undertaking is given.
Court Disposition
Stay of enforcement of registered judgment granted pending outcome of appeal, subject to undertaking; costs reserved; argument on costs stood over.
Orders
- ['A stay of enforcement of the judgment registered in this Court pending the outcome of the appeal is granted on the basis that Hudson Investment Group Limited provide the proposed written undertaking by 5.00pm on 1 September 2006.' 'Costs are reserved.' 'Argument on costs is stood over to a date to be fixed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment