Pacific Leaf Investments Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1657
The modification application satisfies requirements under s 4.55(2) and s 4.55(3) of the EPA Act, as the development is substantially the same, complies with height and FSR controls, and relevant planning matters do not preclude approval.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Modification Application / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Modification application granted by consent, conditions imposed.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'development Control' 'medium Density Residential Zoning']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Modification Application / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the modified development is substantially the same as originally approved' 'Compliance with relevant planning controls and regulations' 'Consideration of submissions and statutory requirements']
Ratio Decidendi
The modification application satisfies requirements under s 4.55(2) and s 4.55(3) of the EPA Act, as the development is substantially the same, complies with height and FSR controls, and relevant planning matters do not preclude approval.
Court Disposition
Modification application granted by consent, conditions imposed.
Orders
- ['Consent granted to Modification Application 787/2021/A, as amended, for reconfiguration and expansion of approved development at 14-16 Botany Street, Randwick, subject to conditions in Annexure A.' 'Development consent 787/2021 modified subject to consolidated conditions in Annexure B.' "Applicant to pay...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment