Pacific Turf v Johnston [2001] NSWSC 542

Pacific Turf v Johnston [2001] NSWSC 542

A genuine dispute exists as to the plaintiff's liability to repay the funds because evidence supports an argument that the money was advanced as risk or working capital, possibly on terms postponing repayment until surplus funds are available, making the statutory demand liable to be set aside.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Decision at First Instance
Outcome
Statutory demand set aside; defendant to pay plaintiff's costs
Legal Topics
['statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'loan Agreements']
['corporations Law'] ['statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'loan Agreements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Decision at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether there is a 'genuine dispute' as to the debt underlying the statutory demand" 'Whether the alleged loan is repayable only upon surplus funds being available' 'Whether the terms of the loan agreement are too vague to be enforceable']

Ratio Decidendi

A genuine dispute exists as to the plaintiff's liability to repay the funds because evidence supports an argument that the money was advanced as risk or working capital, possibly on terms postponing repayment until surplus funds are available, making the statutory demand liable to be set aside.

Court Disposition

Statutory demand set aside; defendant to pay plaintiff's costs

Orders

  • ['Order One in the originating process (setting aside the statutory demand)' "Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs on a party and party basis"]