In the matter of Pages Equipment Holdings Pty Ltd (admin apptd) [2020] NSWSC 959
The Court appointed provisional liquidators because there was a good arguable case for winding up on grounds including alleged diversion of assets, insolvency or likely insolvency, oppression and just and equitable grounds; the balance of convenience favoured preserving remaining assets and enabling independent investigation; and the Court was not satisfied that creditors' interests would be better served by continuation of voluntary administrations, given risks associated with creditor voting, questions affecting Sales' administration, the advantages of one independent officer of the Court investigating the group, and practical difficulties with Phire's separate Victorian administrators.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application for Appointment of Provisional Liquidators Under S 472(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) in Winding Up Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Application Before Final Hearing of Winding Up Application
- Outcome
- Provisional liquidators appointed to Pages Equipment Holdings Pty Ltd, Pages Sales Pty Ltd and Phire Pty Ltd; their voluntary administrations terminated; application concerning Pages Austructures Pty Ltd deferred; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['appointment of Provisional Liquidators' 'termination of Voluntary Administrations' 'just and Equitable Winding Up' 'oppression and Breakdown of Trust and Confidence' 'interests of Creditors Under S 440 A(3)' 'preservation of Company Assets' 'independent Investigation of Company Affairs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application for Appointment of Provisional Liquidators Under S 472(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) in Winding Up Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Application Before Final Hearing of Winding Up Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was a reasonable prospect that winding up orders would be made in respect of Pages Equipment Holdings Pty Ltd, Pages Sales Pty Ltd and Phire Pty Ltd.' 'Whether the balance of convenience supported appointing provisional liquidators to companies that were in voluntary administration.' 'Whether the Court was satisfied under s 440A(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that it was in the interests of creditors for the companies to continue under administration rather than have provisional liquidators appointed.' 'Whether the voluntary administrations should terminate upon appointment of provisional liquidators.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court appointed provisional liquidators because there was a good arguable case for winding up on grounds including alleged diversion of assets, insolvency or likely insolvency, oppression and just and equitable grounds; the balance of convenience favoured preserving remaining assets and enabling independent investigation; and the Court was not satisfied that creditors' interests would be better served by continuation of voluntary administrations, given risks associated with creditor voting, questions affecting Sales' administration, the advantages of one independent officer of the Court investigating the group, and practical difficulties with Phire's separate Victorian administrators.
Court Disposition
Provisional liquidators appointed to Pages Equipment Holdings Pty Ltd, Pages Sales Pty Ltd and Phire Pty Ltd; their voluntary administrations terminated; application concerning Pages Austructures Pty Ltd deferred; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Mr Peter Gothard and Ms Robyn Duggan of KPMG be appointed provisional liquidators jointly and severally of Pages Equipment Holdings Pty Ltd (admin apptd); Pages Sales Pty Ltd (admin apptd); and Phire Pty Ltd (admin apptd).' 'The voluntary administration of each of Pages Equipment Holdings Pty Ltd, Pages Sales Pty...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment