Lim v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1579
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; therefore the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement without a merits assessment of the issues originally in dispute.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'subdivision' 'residential Development' 'costs Thrown Away']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether Development Application No. DA201700511 should be approved subject to conditions following amendment of the application.']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; therefore the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement without a merits assessment of the issues originally in dispute.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No. DA2017005114 and to rely upon the amended plans listed in the orders and annexed behind Annexure "A".' "The applicant is to pay the Council's costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment