In the matter of Painaway Australia Pty Ltd (in prov liq)(admin apptd) - Painaway Australia Pty Ltd v JAKL Group Pty Ltd & ors [2011] NSWSC 205

In the matter of Painaway Australia Pty Ltd (in prov liq)(admin apptd) - Painaway Australia Pty Ltd v JAKL Group Pty Ltd & ors [2011] NSWSC 205

A binding agreement came into existence granting Painaway an exclusive, irrevocable and assignable licence regarding the relevant intellectual property including trade marks and formulas, established by manifestation of mutual assent or by conventional estoppel. Nature’s Remedies is contractually precluded from denying such agreement, and the licence was not validly terminated. The licence is assignable as to the trade marks, though the confidential formulas are not property assignable as such—the contractual rights attached to them may nevertheless be exercised or transferred as contemplated. Nassar and Hyder are limited to contractual rights under the agreement (including a share in...

Parties
Applicant: Painaway Australia Pty Ltd; First Respondent: JAKL Group Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Mickey Rose Investments Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: Angelo's Angels Pty Ltd; Fourth Respondent: Nature's Remedies Pty Ltd; Fifth Respondent: John William Carroll; Sixth Respondent: Linda Jane Carroll; Seventh Respondent: Angelo Hyder; Eighth Respondent: Elias Michael Nassar
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 March 2011
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Judgment After Hearing Issues Including Contract, Estoppel, Intellectual Property and Corporations Law
Outcome
Licence agreement held binding and exclusive; Nature's Remedies Cross-Claim dismissed; Nassar/Hyder shareholding claim dismissed; parties to bring in orders
Legal Topics
Offer and Acceptance, Conventional Estoppel, Exclusive Licence, Assignment of Intellectual Property, Pre Incorporation Contracts
Contract Law Equity Intellectual Property Law Corporations Law Offer and Acceptance Conventional Estoppel Exclusive Licence Assignment of Intellectual Property +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 36 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Painaway Australia Pty Ltd

Applicant

JAKL Group Pty Ltd

First Respondent

Mickey Rose Investments Pty Ltd

Second Respondent

Angelo's Angels Pty Ltd

Third Respondent

Nature's Remedies Pty Ltd

Fourth Respondent

John William Carroll

Fifth Respondent

Linda Jane Carroll

Sixth Respondent

Angelo Hyder

Seventh Respondent

Elias Michael Nassar

Eighth Respondent

Procedural Posture

Principal Judgment / Judgment After Hearing Issues Including Contract, Estoppel, Intellectual Property and Corporations Law

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a binding agreement came into existence granting Painaway exclusive licence to intellectual property, trade marks and formulas
  2. 2 Whether conventional estoppel precludes Nature's Remedies denying the licence agreement
  3. 3 Whether the granted licence is assignable

Ratio Decidendi

A binding agreement came into existence granting Painaway an exclusive, irrevocable and assignable licence regarding the relevant intellectual property including trade marks and formulas, established by manifestation of mutual assent or by conventional estoppel. Nature’s Remedies is contractually precluded from denying such agreement, and the licence was not validly terminated. The licence is assignable as to the trade marks, though the confidential formulas are not property assignable as such—the contractual rights attached to them may nevertheless be exercised or transferred as contemplated. Nassar and Hyder are limited to contractual rights under the agreement (including a share in...

Court Disposition

Licence agreement held binding and exclusive; Nature's Remedies Cross-Claim dismissed; Nassar/Hyder shareholding claim dismissed; parties to bring in orders

Orders

  • Nature's Remedies Cross-Claim dismissed
  • Nassar/Hyder alternative Cross-Claim (re shareholding in Nature’s Remedies) dismissed