MEAA and ORS v PALACE CINEMA MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED and LOTUS CINEMA CORPORATION PTY LTD [1997] IRCA 123
On the evidence, both Lotus Cinema Corporation Pty Ltd and Palace Cinema Management Pty Limited were bound by the Award relevant to the applicants' employment, either directly or by transmission, and applicants were entitled to amounts under the Award subject to set-off for payments already made and interest at 12%.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Workplace Relations Act 1996 S179 / Decision and Orders After Hearing
- Outcome
- Applicants succeed; parties to file consent orders in light of decision; set-off and interest applicable; liberty to apply.
- Legal Topics
- ['award Coverage' 'respondency' 'transmission of Business' 'set Off of Over Award Payments' 'interest on Underpayments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Workplace Relations Act 1996 S179 / Decision and Orders After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Lotus Cinema Corporation Pty Ltd was bound by the Theatrical Employees (Cinema and Drive-In Industry) Award 1983 prior to roping-in' 'Whether Palace Cinema Management Pty Limited was also bound by the Award as an assignee or transmittee of business' 'Whether respondents can set off over-award/extra payments against award entitlements' 'Entitlement to interest on award claims']
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence, both Lotus Cinema Corporation Pty Ltd and Palace Cinema Management Pty Limited were bound by the Award relevant to the applicants' employment, either directly or by transmission, and applicants were entitled to amounts under the Award subject to set-off for payments already made and interest at 12%.
Court Disposition
Applicants succeed; parties to file consent orders in light of decision; set-off and interest applicable; liberty to apply.
Orders
- ['The parties file Consent Orders in accordance with these reasons.' 'Liberty to apply.' 'Respondent entitled to offset against any amounts due any remitted sums to the Australian Taxation Office pursuant to law on behalf of applicants.' 'Stay of 21 days on payment of amounts due.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment