Palermo Seafoods Pty Ltd v Lunapas Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 175
There is scope for legitimate argument that the appellant could receive a benefit exceeding $100,000 if successful, so the appeal cannot be struck out as incompetent at this stage; notice of motion seeking to strike out the appeal is stood over for further hearing with the appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Notice of motion to strike out appeal as incompetent not granted; notice of motion stood over for further hearing with the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal' 'strike Out Application' 'competency of Appeal' 'security for Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether appeal is incompetent under s 101(2)(r) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) as not involving $100,000 or more' 'Whether there is a realistic prospect of $100,000 or more being obtained on a successful appeal' 'Application to strike out appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
There is scope for legitimate argument that the appellant could receive a benefit exceeding $100,000 if successful, so the appeal cannot be struck out as incompetent at this stage; notice of motion seeking to strike out the appeal is stood over for further hearing with the appeal.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion to strike out appeal as incompetent not granted; notice of motion stood over for further hearing with the appeal.
Orders
- ['Notice of motion seeking security for costs stood over to 25 May 2015.' 'Respondent to security for costs motion to file and serve affidavit material by 18 May 2015.' 'Notice of motion seeking to have appeal dismissed as incompetent stood over for further hearing with the appeal.' 'Costs of today reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment