Webber v Racing New South Wales [2019] NSWSC 46
The refusal by Racing NSW to renew the plaintiff's trainer's licence for the period expiring 30 June 2017 was invalid due to the denial of procedural fairness, as adverse material was not disclosed to her, and a declaration of invalidity was warranted given the ongoing adverse impact on her reputation and future licensing prospects.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Pam Anne Marie Webber; First Defendant: Racing NSW; Second Defendant: Peter N V'landys
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration made that the decision refusing to renew the plaintiff's trainer's licence was invalid.
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Fairness, Judicial Review, Natural Justice, Licensing Decisions, Discretionary Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pam Anne Marie Webber
Plaintiff
Racing NSW
First Defendant
Peter N V'landys
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Racing NSW's refusal to renew Ms Webber's trainer's licence was invalid for denial of procedural fairness
- 2 Whether discretionary relief should be given despite the expiry of the licence period
- 3 Whether the court should address additional grounds of review beyond jurisdictional error
Ratio Decidendi
The refusal by Racing NSW to renew the plaintiff's trainer's licence for the period expiring 30 June 2017 was invalid due to the denial of procedural fairness, as adverse material was not disclosed to her, and a declaration of invalidity was warranted given the ongoing adverse impact on her reputation and future licensing prospects.
Court Disposition
Declaration made that the decision refusing to renew the plaintiff's trainer's licence was invalid.
Orders
- Declaration that the decision of the defendants given 1 September 2016 refusing to renew the plaintiff's trainer's licence for the period expiring 30 June 2017 was invalid.
- Parties to be heard as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment