Murray v McOnie [2019] NSWSC 189
Given the beneficiaries' failure to collect or provide instructions for the contents after ample opportunity, and the executor's duty to deliver vacant possession on sale, the executor would be justified in disposing of any contents not collected by 26 March 2019 to a waste disposal facility as abandoned property.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Pamela Ann Murray; First Defendant: Megan Ann McOnie; Second Defendant: David John McOnie; Third Defendant: Paul Pryde McOnie
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Advice Application / Final Orders and Disposition
- Outcome
- Judicial advice granted: Executor justified in disposing of contents not collected by 26 March 2019; directions given for access, notification, and submissions on costs.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Advice to Executor, Trustee Justification, Abandonment of Property, Estate Administration, Beneficiary Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pamela Ann Murray
Plaintiff
Megan Ann McOnie
First Defendant
David John McOnie
Second Defendant
Paul Pryde McOnie
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Advice Application / Final Orders and Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the executor is justified in disposing of the contents of the garage at the Ben Boyd Road property by causing them to be delivered to a waste disposal facility
- 2 Whether sufficient opportunity has been given to the beneficiaries to collect estate property
- 3 Whether the remaining estate property can be considered abandoned
Ratio Decidendi
Given the beneficiaries' failure to collect or provide instructions for the contents after ample opportunity, and the executor's duty to deliver vacant possession on sale, the executor would be justified in disposing of any contents not collected by 26 March 2019 to a waste disposal facility as abandoned property.
Court Disposition
Judicial advice granted: Executor justified in disposing of contents not collected by 26 March 2019; directions given for access, notification, and submissions on costs.
Orders
- Note that the plaintiff has agreed to allow access to the garage at the Ben Boyd Road property by any one or more of the defendants or a representative on their behalf for inspection and removal of contents they wish to retain.
- Provision of access is by collection of a key arranged with the real estate agents; property in the garage remains at defendants' risk while they or their representatives have the key.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment