Cummings v De Santis; De Santis v De Santis [2002] NSWSC 729

Cummings v De Santis; De Santis v De Santis [2002] NSWSC 729

The plaintiffs, a widow and a de facto partner, each received substantial benefit under the will. Both are entitled to a legal life estate in a property, and have sufficient provision for their proper maintenance, education and advancement having regard to their circumstances and statutory principles. Mary De Santis is granted a legacy of $38,000 in addition to her entitlement. Pamela Cummings' claim for further provision is dismissed as she has not been left without adequate provision.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 August 2002
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application (succession, Will) / Judgment After Hearing at First Instance
Outcome
Pamela Cummings' claim dismissed; Mary De Santis granted legacy; costs orders as set out.
Legal Topics
['family Provision Act Application' 'construction of Will' 'life Estates' 'entitlement of De Facto Partners' 'extension of Time Under Family Provision Act']
['succession Law' 'equity'] ['family Provision Act Application' 'construction of Will' 'life Estates' 'entitlement of De Facto Partners' 'extension of Time Under Family Provision Act']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Application (succession, Will) / Judgment After Hearing at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether plaintiffs (widow and de facto partner) have been left without adequate provision for their proper maintenance, education and advancement under the will' 'Whether the bequest of a life estate in clause 3 entitles the beneficiaries to a legal life estate and its practical effect' 'Whether time should be extended for application under Family Provision Act' 'Whether a disclaimer has been effected by Mary De Santis']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiffs, a widow and a de facto partner, each received substantial benefit under the will. Both are entitled to a legal life estate in a property, and have sufficient provision for their proper maintenance, education and advancement having regard to their circumstances and statutory principles. Mary De Santis is granted a legacy of $38,000 in addition to her entitlement. Pamela Cummings' claim for further provision is dismissed as she has not been left without adequate provision.

Court Disposition

Pamela Cummings' claim dismissed; Mary De Santis granted legacy; costs orders as set out.

Orders

  • ['Dismiss the summons of Pamela Helen Cummings filed on 21 July 2000.' "Order Pamela Helen Cummings pay the defendant's costs of her claim, subject to submissions." 'Extend time for Mary De Santis to make application to 7 January 2002.' 'Order Mary De Santis receive a legacy of $38,000 in addition to benefits under...