Budd v Privacy Commissioner [2006] FCA 1205

The order for costs made on 30 August 2006 should be rescinded because the respondent did not seek an order for costs, as stated in their submissions.

Parties: Applicant: Pamela Joan Budd; Respondent: Privacy Commissioner
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 05 September 2006
Procedural Posture: Application / Variation of Orders After Judgment
Outcome: Order for costs rescinded; court order varied to reflect submissions
Legal Topics: Privacy, Court Orders, Costs

Administrative Law Privacy Court Orders Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1

Parties

Pamela Joan Budd

Applicant

Privacy Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Variation of Orders After Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the orders made on 30 August 2006 should be varied to reflect that the respondent did not seek an order for costs

Ratio Decidendi

The order for costs made on 30 August 2006 should be rescinded because the respondent did not seek an order for costs, as stated in their submissions.

Court Disposition

Order for costs rescinded; court order varied to reflect submissions

Orders

Order 2 dated 30 August 2006 be rescinded.