Arab v Pan, in the matter of Pan [2023] FCA 948
On the evidence, including correspondence from Patrick Mak & Tse and an attempted personal service, it was not practicable to serve the respondent personally. Because Patrick Mak & Tse acted generally for the respondent in relation to his bankruptcy and appeared to be in contact with him, personal service should be dispensed with and substituted service by hand delivery to that firm should be ordered.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Substituted Service in Bankruptcy Proceeding / Ex Parte Interim Application
- Outcome
- Application granted; personal service dispensed with and substituted service ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['substituted Service' 'personal Service' 'bankrupt Estate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Substituted Service in Bankruptcy Proceeding / Ex Parte Interim Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether personal service of the applicants' application and supporting affidavit on the respondent was not practicable." "Whether personal service should be dispensed with and substituted service ordered by delivering the documents to the respondent's solicitors in Hong Kong."]
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence, including correspondence from Patrick Mak & Tse and an attempted personal service, it was not practicable to serve the respondent personally. Because Patrick Mak & Tse acted generally for the respondent in relation to his bankruptcy and appeared to be in contact with him, personal service should be dispensed with and substituted service by hand delivery to that firm should be ordered.
Court Disposition
Application granted; personal service dispensed with and substituted service ordered.
Orders
- ["Upon the undertaking of the applicants' solicitor to pay any applicable filing fee, leave be granted to the applicants to file the interim application dated 9 August 2023." 'The interim application be returnable instanter.' "Pursuant to r 1.34 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) and/or r 14.03(3) of the Federal...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment