Pancontinental Mining Ltd v Coopers & Lybrand (Securities) Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 204
A case has not been made out for variation of the undertakings; without supporting evidence and with only submissions from the bar table, the discretion to vary undertakings is not appropriately exercised.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Variation of Undertakings / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['breach of Confidence' 'preliminary Discovery' 'undertakings' 'disclosure of Documents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Motion for Variation of Undertakings / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the undertakings regarding disclosure of information should be varied to include counsel, solicitor and expert witnesses involved in related proceedings.' 'Whether it is appropriate to allow documents produced for the purpose of discovery to be used to alter parameters of a related contest.']
Ratio Decidendi
A case has not been made out for variation of the undertakings; without supporting evidence and with only submissions from the bar table, the discretion to vary undertakings is not appropriately exercised.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Motion for variation of undertakings dismissed.' 'Applicant to pay costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment