PANGAS v NEWJUR PTY LIMITED [1995] NSWCA 357

PANGAS v NEWJUR PTY LIMITED [1995] NSWCA 357

The adjournment was granted primarily because not all material relevant to the stay application was before the Court, and immediate urgency was lacking due to a related stay in effect.

Parties
Applicant: Pangas; Respondent: Newjur Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 October 1995
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Adjournment of Notice of Motion
Outcome
Adjournment granted; questions of costs and security reserved.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Adjournment, Security for Costs
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Adjournment Security for Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pangas

Applicant

Newjur Pty Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Adjournment of Notice of Motion

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an adjournment should be granted for the stay application
  2. 2 Whether immediate order for costs or security is appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The adjournment was granted primarily because not all material relevant to the stay application was before the Court, and immediate urgency was lacking due to a related stay in effect.

Court Disposition

Adjournment granted; questions of costs and security reserved.

Orders

  • Matter stood over to 13th November 1995.
  • Question of today's costs reserved.