Papadimitropoulos v The Queen [1957] HCA 74

Papadimitropoulos v The Queen [1957] HCA 74

Fraudulent representation as to marriage constitutes fraud in the inducement, not as to the nature of the act or identity of the person; it does not vitiate actual consent to sexual intercourse for the purpose of the crime of rape. Therefore, the applicant's conviction for rape, based on such fraud, cannot stand.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Special Leave to Appeal; Appeal From Conviction
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed.
Legal Topics
['rape' 'consent' 'fraudulent Inducement' 'mistake' 'mitigating Circumstances']
['criminal Law'] ['rape' 'consent' 'fraudulent Inducement' 'mistake' 'mitigating Circumstances']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Special Leave to Appeal; Appeal From Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether consent obtained by fraudulent representation of marriage constitutes no consent and amounts to rape' "Whether the applicant's actions fell under fraud vitiating consent as to the act itself or antecedent/collateral matters"]

Ratio Decidendi

Fraudulent representation as to marriage constitutes fraud in the inducement, not as to the nature of the act or identity of the person; it does not vitiate actual consent to sexual intercourse for the purpose of the crime of rape. Therefore, the applicant's conviction for rape, based on such fraud, cannot stand.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed.

Orders

  • ['Special leave to appeal granted.' 'Hearing of the application for special leave to be treated as the hearing of the appeal.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Conviction quashed.']