Paper Trade Processing (Aust) Pty Limited v Environment Protection Authority [2018] NSWLEC 22
Because the disputed merit issues between the EPA and the Applicant had been resolved to the EPA's satisfaction and the related development consent had been granted, the remaining concern preventing the grant of the environment protection licence was removed and the appeal was upheld.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal to Grant an Environment Protection Licence / Ex Tempore Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Environmental Protection Licence granted; exhibits returned.
- Legal Topics
- ['environment Protection Licence' 'waste and Resource Recovery Facility' 'development Consent' 'waste Management' 'air Quality and Odour' 'water Management']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal to Grant an Environment Protection Licence / Ex Tempore Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Applicant should be granted an environment protection licence for the operation of a waste and resource recovery facility at 49 Heathcote Road, Moorebank.' "Whether the resolved merit issues and the grant of development consent in related proceedings removed the EPA's concerns."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the disputed merit issues between the EPA and the Applicant had been resolved to the EPA's satisfaction and the related development consent had been granted, the remaining concern preventing the grant of the environment protection licence was removed and the appeal was upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Environmental Protection Licence granted; exhibits returned.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The applicant is granted an Environmental Protection Licence for use of 49 Heathcote Road, Moorebank as a waste and resource recovery facility to process and store 28,000 tonnes of material per annum, as in Annexure A.' 'The exhibits, other than Exhibits A, B and 1, are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment