Parmalat Australia Ltd v Rush Drinks Ltd [2010] FCA 675
The Court granted leave to serve the notice of appeal out of jurisdiction using alternative methods available through an English solicitor, due to the apparent unavailability of diplomatic channel service in the UK and satisfaction with requirements under Order 8 r 3(2).
- Parties
- Applicant: Parmalat Australia Ltd; Respondent: Rush Drinks Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Application for Leave to Serve Notice of Appeal Out of Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Leave granted to serve notice of appeal out of jurisdiction; extension of time for service allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Jurisdiction, Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Parmalat Australia Ltd
Applicant
Rush Drinks Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Application for Leave to Serve Notice of Appeal Out of Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to serve a notice of appeal out of the jurisdiction
- 2 Whether extension of time to serve notice of appeal is appropriate
- 3 Appropriate method of service in the United Kingdom
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted leave to serve the notice of appeal out of jurisdiction using alternative methods available through an English solicitor, due to the apparent unavailability of diplomatic channel service in the UK and satisfaction with requirements under Order 8 r 3(2).
Court Disposition
Leave granted to serve notice of appeal out of jurisdiction; extension of time for service allowed.
Orders
- Leave granted to serve notice of appeal in the UK using process via English solicitor.
- Extension of time for service of notice of appeal granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment