Aminzadeh v Parramatta City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1223
The Court is satisfied that the proposed development meets the objectives of the R2 zone and the subdivision standard; the written request has adequately addressed the matters under cl 4.6(3); there are sufficient environmental planning grounds; non-compliance is negligible and results in no perceivable impact; the development is in the public interest; and all other preconditions for granting consent for a variation are met.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Merits Appeal Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'minimum Lot Size' 'subdivision' 'dual Occupancy' 'variation of Development Standards']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Merits Appeal Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a variation of the minimum lot size standard for dual occupancy under cl 6.11(1) PLEP should be granted via cl 4.6 of the Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2011']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court is satisfied that the proposed development meets the objectives of the R2 zone and the subdivision standard; the written request has adequately addressed the matters under cl 4.6(3); there are sufficient environmental planning grounds; non-compliance is negligible and results in no perceivable impact; the development is in the public interest; and all other preconditions for granting consent for a variation are met.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Amended Development Application 130/2018 for demolition of existing structures, construction of attached dual occupancy with Torrens title subdivision of one lot into two lots, on Lot 27 DP 35735, also known as 28 Coffey Street, Ermington is approved, subject to the conditions in Annexure...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment