Parramatta City Council v M E and B D Pty Limited [2012] NSWLEC 47
The awning continues to be erected and used without development consent, and failure to comply with s 121B order constitutes a breach under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act; however, orders for remedy or restraint are deferred until receivers and managers can be heard.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Enforcement / Adjournment Pending Further Hearing on Relief
- Outcome
- Proceedings adjourned
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'existing Use' 'breach of Statutory Order' 'remedies for Breach']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Enforcement / Adjournment Pending Further Hearing on Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the erection and use of the awning was in breach of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether failure to comply with s 121B order constitutes a breach' 'Whether relief (removal of awning) should be ordered']
Ratio Decidendi
The awning continues to be erected and used without development consent, and failure to comply with s 121B order constitutes a breach under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act; however, orders for remedy or restraint are deferred until receivers and managers can be heard.
Court Disposition
Proceedings adjourned
Orders
- ['Proceedings adjourned to 9.30am on 13 March 2012 before Preston CJ.' 'Council directed to notify and provide judgment reasons to receivers and managers and invite their participation.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment