Bourot v New South Wales Department of Public Works and Services & Anor [2001] NSWIRComm 257
In the absence of a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing and as no prejudice is demonstrated to the respondents, the respondents' notice of motion filed out of time under rule 82 must be set aside.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Declaratory Relief / Interlocutory Judgment on Strike Out Motion
- Outcome
- Respondents' notice of motion (as to relief under paragraphs 1, 2, 3) set aside; costs reserved; matter stood over for further hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdiction' 'procedure' 'declaratory Relief' 'extension of Time' 'setting Aside Notice of Motion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Declaratory Relief / Interlocutory Judgment on Strike Out Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondents' notice of motion should be set aside for being filed out of time" "Whether time for filing the respondents' notice of motion should be extended in absence of sufficient explanation"]
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing and as no prejudice is demonstrated to the respondents, the respondents' notice of motion filed out of time under rule 82 must be set aside.
Court Disposition
Respondents' notice of motion (as to relief under paragraphs 1, 2, 3) set aside; costs reserved; matter stood over for further hearing.
Orders
- ["Respondents' notice of motion filed on 15 June 2001 seeking relief under paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 is set aside." 'Costs are reserved.' 'Proceedings are stood over for further hearing at 10am on Monday 11 December next to deal with outstanding interlocutory issues.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment